PENSUM F22: Sofie Pedersen

Diverse tekster om psykiatri og recovery, samt det at forstå psykisk lidelse fra et alment/virksomhedsteoretisk perspektiv:

Bracken, P., & Thomas, P. (2010). From Szasz to Foucault: On the Role of Critical Psychiatry. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 17(3), 219–228.

Dinesen, M. R., Albrechtsen, S. L. R., & Pedersen, S. (2020). En selvfølgelig succes – en kritisk udforskning af patientuddannelsers subjektiveringspraksis. Nordiske Udkast, 47(1).

Harper, D., & Speed, E. (2012). Uncovering Recovery: The Resistible Rise of Recovery and Resilience. Studies in Social Justice, 6(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v6i1.1066

Holen, M., & Ringer, A. (2021). Recovery i psykiatriske behandlingsinstitutioner og ideen om sygdomsindsigt. In J. Oute & K. Jørgensen (Eds.), Recovery-orienterede praksisser–i velfærdsinstitutioner og civilsamfund (pp. 77–90). Samfundslitteratur.

Holmboe, A., & Risdorf, H. (2013). Introduktion til Erich Wulffs fænomenologiske og kritisk-psykologiske analyse af det skizofrene vanvid. Nordiske Udkast, 41(2).

Jensen, P. M., Karlsson, B., & Borg, M. (2021). Recovery i den nordiske velfærdsstat – accept, tilpasning eller oprør? In J. Oute & K. Jørgensen (Eds.), Recovery-orienterede praksisser–i velfærdsinstitutioner og civilsamfund (s. 43–59). Samfundslitteratur.

Karpatschof, B. (1989). Galskaben, psykiatrien og virksomhedsteorien. I M. Hedegaard, V. R. Hansen, & S. Thyssen (Eds.), Et virksomt liv – udforskning af virksomhedsteoriens praksis (s. 104–120). Aarhus Universitetsforlag.

Morgan, A. (2015). Is psychiatry dying? Crisis and critique in contemporary psychiatry. Social Theory & Health, 13(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2015.5

Pedersen, S. (2019). When Young Adulthood Presents a Double Challenge: Mental Illness, Disconnected Activities and Relational Agency. I M. Hedegaard & A. Edwards (Eds.), Supporting Difficult Transitions: Children, Young People and their Carers (s. 221–240). Bloomsbury Academic.

Pedersen, S. (2021). Fællesskabets betydning i selvansvarliggørelsens tidsalder: Om vinterjordbær, recovery og kollektivt (selv)ansvar i Japan. Tidsskrift for Forskning I Sygdom Og Samfund, 18(34).

Pedersen, S., & Knudsen, R. (2022). Peerstøtte; mellem abstrakte forventninger og konkret praksis. Nordisk Välfärdsforskning, 7(1), 36–51.

Scheper-Hughes, N., & Lovell, A. M. (1986). Breaking the circuit of social control: Lesson in public psychiatry from Italy and Franco Basaglia. Social Science & Medicine, 23(2), 159–178.

Topor, A., Larsen, I. B., & Bøe, T. D. (2020). Återhämtning – från personlig reformering till social förändring. Mad in Sweden. https://madinsweden.org/2020/04/aterhamtning-fran-personlig-reformering-+till-social-forandring/

Wulff, E. (2013). Om konstitutionen af den skizofrene uforståelighed. Nordiske Udkast, 41(2).

Almenpsykologisk, virksomhedsteoretisk teori om selvet:

Engelsted, N. (1989). Personlighedens almene grundlag: En teoretisk ekskursion i psykologiens historie. Aarhus Universitetsforlag.

González Rey, F. L. (1999). Personality, subject and human development: The subjective character of human activity. I S. Chaiklin, M. Hedegaard, & U. J. Jensen (Eds.), Activity theory and social practice: Cultural-historical approaches (s. 253–275). Aarhus University Press.

Stetsenko, A. (2012). Personhood: An activist project of historical becoming through collaborative pursuits of social transformation. New Ideas in Psychology, 30(1), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.11.008

Stetsenko, A. (2013). The Challenge of Individuality in Cultural- Historical Activity Theory: “Collectividual” Dialectics from a Transformative Activist Stance. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 14(2), 07–28.

Stetsenko, A., & Arievitch, I. M. (2004). The Self in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory. Theory & Psychology, 14(4), 475–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354304044921

Stetsenko, A., & Arievitch, I. M. (2010). Cultural‐historical activity theory: Foundational worldview, major principles, and the relevance of sociocultural context. I J. Martin & S. Kirschner (Eds.), The sociocultural turn in psychology: The contextual emergence of mind and self (s. 231–252). Columbia University Press.

Kulturhistoriske og/eller økologisk psykologiske forståelser:

Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology. Stanford University Press.

Barker, R. & Wright, H. (1971). Midwest and its children: The psychological Ecology of an American town. Archon Books.

Costall, A. (1995). Socializing Affordances. Theory and Psychology, 5(4), 467‐481.

Hedegaard, M. (2012): Analyzing Children's Learning and Development in Everyday Settings from a Cultural‐Historical Wholeness Approach. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(2), 127‐138.

Heft, H. (1989). Affordances and the body: An intentional analysis of Gibson’s ecological approach to visual perception. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 19(1), 1‐30

Jones, K. (2003). What is an Affordance? Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 107‐114

Kono, T. (2009). Social affordances and the possibility of ecological linguistics. Integrated Psychological and Behavioral Science, 43, 356–373.

Pedersen, S. (2019). Not Just a School: Explorations and Theoretical Considerations in Relation to the Human Eco-niche. I: K. Murakami, J. Cresswell, T. Kono & T. Zittoun (Eds.), The Ethos of Theorizing (s. 212-221). Captus Press.

Pedersen, S., & Bang, J. (2016). Youth development as subjectified subjectivity– a dialectical-ecological model of analysis. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(3), 470–91.

Pedersen, S., & Bang, J. (2016). Historicizing affordance theory: A rendezvous between ecological psychology and cultural-historical activity theory. Theory & Psychology, 26(6), 731–50.

Wartofsky, M. (1973). Models: Representation and the scientific understanding. D. Reidel Publishing Company

Wartofsky, M. (1983). The Child’s Construction of the World and the World’s Construction of the Child: From Historical Epistemology to Historical Psychology. I: F.S. Kessel & A.W. Siegel (Eds.), The child and other cultural inventions. Praeger.